keddy 1:37 Tue Jan 13
QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Not a single away point Harry Redknapp pointing at the lack of quality in the squad Out of the Cup The other teams around them are picking up points
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Nuclear Noodle
1:46 Sun Jan 18
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Mad Dog 1:39 Sun Jan 18 Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Mad Dog
1:39 Sun Jan 18
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
I hate qpr and their tinpot ground I hate twitchy and glad he's getting found out I hate the fact that they had a horrid plastic pitch 30 years ago
Hope they go down and never come back.
|
Sxboy_66
1:28 Sun Jan 18
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Only 4 points between 19th/18th and 12th.
It's impossible to call at the moment, if any one of the bottom 8 gets a couple of lucky or unexpected wins they'll pull clear.
On form and potential/quality to improve I've got to say it'll be 3 from Villa, QPR, Leicester, or Hull. (Hull might be saved if their strikers get back to fitness fairly soon)
|
franksfat&slow&wank
12:30 Sun Jan 18
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Austins goals will keep them up IMO Villa will go they can't buy a goal
|
Private Dancer
12:21 Sun Jan 18
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Still too early to say, but Harry will be history if they don't pick up soon.
|
Coffee
12:12 Sun Jan 18
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Scraper 12:09 Sun Jan 18
The novelist's motto.
|
One McAvennieeeeee
12:10 Sun Jan 18
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Yeah, our owners would never relegate us.
Never.
|
Scraper
12:09 Sun Jan 18
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Yes, life can be funny when you make things up.
|
Justin R
12:03 Sun Jan 18
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Interesting.
I like QPR, have been to Loftus Road many times over the years due to friends and family having various Corporate deals there over the years, and a mate I've known since being born being absolutely bonkers for them, living 200 yards from the ground for a while and all sorts of other reasons, including an away game in 1977 being my first live match watching West Ham. If it's possible to have a 'second team' in the same league, they are mine.
But they are doomed.
And that failure does make me laugh a little, a Chairman whom many wanted at Upton Park, a manager whom some still hold a candle for as 'better' than Allerdicci, and a collection of players over the last two seasons who some useless dry wanks insist where the future of West Ham and 'prove' that Big Sam is an idiot.....Morrison last term, and Zarate this.......
And yet they are where they are, despite what the genuinely mentally ill claim as 'missed opportunities' for West Ham.
Funny old life isn't it?
|
Darby_
11:50 Sun Jan 18
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Too early to say that, but it's obvious that he doesn't have the heart for a fight, so he'll fit in well at QPR.
|
1964
11:44 Sun Jan 18
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Has anybody though Sam is right after all and cleverly got rid of Zarate
|
Sniper
11:10 Sun Jan 18
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
A Harry redknapp team struggling away from home. Who'd have thought it
|
Sir Alf
10:51 Sun Jan 18
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
They look doomed yes.
|
:^)
7:40 Sat Jan 17
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Noticed Zarate didn't get a game. Won't be long before he'll be wanting to leave QPR as well.
|
ludo21
7:39 Sat Jan 17
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Harry says they need another striker yet he leaves Zarate as an unused sub today.... very odd.
|
mongo
7:56 Tue Jan 13
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Without Austin they'd be dead and buried
|
franksfat&slow&wank
6:42 Tue Jan 13
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Private Dancer 1:52 Tue Jan 13 Re: QPR! Are they doomed? They only have 1 home game left against bottom half oppo.
That is key , if it goes to form they're doomed
|
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
6:40 Tue Jan 13
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
No quibbles there, mate. It's just an enjoyable intellectual conundrum.
|
Westside
6:09 Tue Jan 13
Re: QPR! Are they doomed?
|
Surface I see what you're saying, but it's so tight I think you need to look at the overall picture. If you take individual teams, Norwich had 20 points after 21 games last season and were 15th, but still got relegated. The 15th place team, currently has the same 20 points this season, after 21 games.
Pundits generally over estimate the points needed for survival. 40 points is often bandied about, but this has only been needed (or greater) 3 times, since the premier league went to 20 teams. I still think 34 points and a better goal difference will be safe this year. It's great this is a just a hypothetical exercise, rather than wondering how we get to 34 points.
|
|